LeanFrontier: nobody chose the version (Field Note 08)
LeanFrontier’s Field Note 08 records the corpus moving to Mathlib v4.33.1 on schedule, with the version chosen by nobody: the upgrade pipeline rebuilt the fingerprint index, re-audited all 114 entrypoints, replayed the kernel, and opened the pull request itself — a person only merged it. Getting there took three stacked defects, each invisible until the one before it was fixed, the best being a validator that refused the upgrade over bytecode it had compiled into its own working tree while running. A fourth outside contributor also sent in a submission, still open pending a rebase onto the new toolchain, and no acceptance was weakened by the upgrade.
contributed to TauCetiProject/TauCeti: an import-density measurement
Opened issue #3954 on TauCetiProject/TauCeti, the machine-generated Lean 4 library, to thank its maintainer and share a measurement: replaying its public history shows internal import density rising from 0.40 to 1.55 per module. The report is the courtesy side of the lean-corpus-density analysis, which used TauCeti’s history as evidence that machine mathematics accumulates.
LeanFrontier: nobody clicked merge (Field Note 07)
LeanFrontier’s Field Note 07 documents the day the maintainer left the merge path: receiver-accepted submissions now merge themselves, with an allowlist read from the default branch so no submission can approve itself, and four have landed with leanfrontier-receiver[bot] as the merging identity — two of them four minutes after opening. Two new theorems entered the corpus under the unattended gate: translation rigidity for characteristic-zero polynomials (over a characteristic-zero integral domain, a polynomial invariant under translation by one nonzero element is constant) and the finite pairwise squared-difference identity (in any commutative ring, the sum of squared differences over all ordered pairs is twice the cardinality times the sum of squares, minus twice the square of the sum). The note also pre-registers the launcher A/B experiment — two launchers differing in exactly one paragraph, eighteen accepted submissions per arm, and a stopping rule fixed in advance — with the first three arm-carrying submissions already in.
LeanFrontier: a neighbour answers half the question (Field Note 06)
LeanFrontier’s Field Note 06 measures the corpus against Tau Ceti, a second machine-generated Lean 4 library, and finds that machine mathematics does accumulate: Tau Ceti’s internal import density rose monotonically across its history, narrowing the open question to whether accumulation survives without a human-written roadmap. The day also took the human out of the merge path — receiver-accepted submissions now merge themselves, and the first unattended submission opened at 15:39 and merged at 15:56:56 — and admitted conjectures as Prop-valued definitions fingerprinted by value, so a conjecture restating known mathematics is rejected as a duplicate. Three new submissions landed (thue-morse-prouhet-power-sums, stern-brocot-coprime-enumeration, padovan-sequence-sum), taking the corpus to 27 modules, and running the pipeline unattended surfaced four defects that reading had missed. The measurement itself lives in the new lean-corpus-density repository.
lean-corpus-density: does machine mathematics accumulate?
lean-corpus-density is a new, reproducible measurement of dependency density in Lean 4 corpora, human and machine-generated. Replaying Tau Ceti’s commit history shows its internal import density rising monotonically as it grew — 0.40 edges per module at ten modules up to 1.55 at 2,314 — evidence that machine-generated mathematics builds on itself rather than merely piling up. The whole analysis is reproducible from file headers; no build is required.
diaz-modulus-lean: a formalized negative result on Diaz's modulus conjecture
diaz-modulus-lean is a new Lean 4
formalization of a negative result on Diaz’s 2004 modulus conjecture: for a
candidate u with e^u and |u| both algebraic, the conjugate ū is a
rational function of u with algebraic coefficients, so no statement about
vanishing matrix coefficients over the algebraic hull can separate a candidate
from an ordinary complex number. It machine-checks the conjecture’s question of
method — how non-holomorphic maps like conjugation and modulus could enter a
transcendence proof at all — in the negative direction.
LeanFrontier: first theorem submissions land, verified through the kernel
LeanFrontier accepted its first batch of machine-generated theorem submissions: the Furstenberg topology on the integers, the tent map semiconjugate to the logistic map, Lucas numbers and their Fibonacci bridges, the Fibonacci Q-matrix, and a closed form for the Josephus problem’s survivor. Submitted modules are now replayed through the kernel before acceptance, and the whole corpus is rechecked whenever Mathlib is upgraded.
LeanFrontier: five new submissions in a day, from sequences to transcendence
LeanFrontier accepted five more machine-generated submissions in a single day: a greatest sequence below a ceiling with bounded steps, how the greatest-step bounded minorant responds to its constraints, Stedman’s plain changes ringing a full extent, Hermite-Lindemann implying that exp is injective on algebraic numbers, and a generalization of finite-group character sum vanishing to noncommutative rings. The receiver was hardened along the way — submissions now authenticate as the LeanFrontier Receiver app, and the corpus dependency graph is published in the catalogue. The whole day is documented in Field Note 05.
LeanFrontier: machine-generated mathematics, verified by the Lean kernel
LeanFrontier is a new Lean 4 library of machine-generated, kernel-verified mathematics. Every theorem it contains has been checked by Lean’s proof kernel rather than taken on faith, which means the machine-generated results carry the same formal guarantees as hand-written proofs.
inversive-geometry-lean: circles and lines as one object
inversive-geometry-lean is a new Lean 4 library for generalized circles — “circlines” — that treats circles and lines as a single object. Each circline is cut out by a Hermitian equation, giving a uniform treatment of inversive geometry inside a proof assistant.
euclean: can a machine recover structure from an anonymized theory?
euclean is a new research project asking whether a machine can recover mathematical structure from an anonymized formal theory armed only with a proof checker. The experiment strips away all the human-readable names and intuition, leaving just a formal theory and the kernel’s verdicts to work from.